Jump to navigation

Counter-terrorism strategy

Regulation of surveillance

The use of surveillance is carefully regulated, as the misuse of surveillance techniques can have serious consequences for our civil rights.

Laws regulating the use of surveillance

In the UK, our civil rights concerning surveillance are protected by:

  • Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA)
  • Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which states that everyone has the right to respect for his or her private and family life, home and correspondence
  • Data Protection Act 1998
  • Covert Surveillance Code of Practice
  • Interception of Communications Code of Practice 

You can find more information about this issue on the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (new window) website.

How legislation offers protection

The legislation listed above protects our rights in different ways:

Necessitating approval at the highest level

Interception warrants require the personal approval of the Secretary of State, who must believe the warrant is necessary either because of national security, preventing or detecting serious crimes, or safeguarding the UK's economic well-being.

Limiting use of information obtained through surveillance

With a few exceptions the law does not allow any information gained from interception to be used as evidence in court. The only exceptions are for offences relating to interception - for example Official Secrets Act offences.

Requiring an independent watchdog

The interception warrant system is overseen by an independent Interception of Communications Commissioner who ensures that authorised agencies have proper processes in place, and have considered the human rights of individuals before interception takes place. 

The Investigatory Powers Tribunal (new window) hears complaints from members of the public about inappropriate interception activities by any of the intelligence services or by public authorities.

Insisting that the surveillance method must fit the crime

Authorising officers must consider whether the level of surveillance is proportionate to the suspected crime - this means your home won't be bugged if you're seen dropping litter but it may be if you're a suspected terrorist.

Protecting others

Authorising officers must consider the risk of 'collateral intrusion', meaning the likelihood of obtaining private information about a person other than the surveillance target, before authorising surveillance or the acquisition of communications data.

Concerned about surveillance?

If you're worried that you've been put under surveillance by certain public authorities without good reason, you should contact the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (new window)

 

In This Section

See Also